Welcome to the language barrier between physicists and mathematicians Assuming that they look for the treasure in pairs that are randomly chosen from the 80 Physicists prefer to use hermitian operators, while mathematicians are not biased towards hermitian operators
Also, if i'm not mistaken, steenrod gives a more direct argument in topology of fibre bundles, but he might be using the long exact sequence of a fibration (which you mentioned). Each of 20 families selected to take part in a treasure hunt consist of a mother, father, son, and daughter I'm not aware of another natural geometric object.
Prove that the manifold $so (n) \subset gl (n, \mathbb {r})$ is connected It is very easy to see that the elements of $so (n. I have known the data of $\\pi_m(so(n))$ from this table From here i got another doubt about how we connect lie stuff in our clifford algebra settings
Like did we really use fundamental theorem of gleason, montgomery and zippin to bring lie group notion here? The generators of $so(n)$ are pure imaginary antisymmetric $n \\times n$ matrices I'm in linear algebra right now and we're mostly just working with vector spaces, but they're introducing us to the basic concepts of fields and groups in preparation taking for abstract algebra la. I'm looking for a reference/proof where i can understand the irreps of $so(n)$
